CUDDALORE: 
          A peace committee meeting, headed by Revenue Divisional  Officer M.Indumathi, resolved the dispute arising out the size of the  fee collected by Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary School at  Chidambaram on Monday.
         The management had been directed to put up on the notice board the  school-specific recommendations of Justice Raviraja Pandian Committee on  fee structure and also whatever excess fees it had collected under  various heads. The school was specifically told to adhere to the Committee  recommendations and dispense with the practice of issuing just slips for  the fees paid and issue proper receipts for all payments remitted.
         The management was also instructed to reinstate Class IV student  David Raja, who was sent out of the school for not paying the fees fixed  by the school, and, also to desist from taking any penal action against  60 students who refused to pay the excessive fees in 2010-2011 and  collect only the revised fees. As parents objected to the collection of capitation fees in the name  of a trust and fees for extra-curricular activities, the management was  told not to force upon students any such activity without the consent of  the parents.
            A major point sticking out in the meeting was the Clause 10 of  Justice Raviraja Pandian Committee, which has left it to the schools to  determine the size of fees to be collected for technology-driven  education such as running smart classes or imparting e-learning. The school was collecting Rs. 10,000 a year (it varies just by Rs. 500 to Rs. 1,000 for lower classes) for smart classes. Correspondent C.R. Lakshmikandan took the view that the amount would  differ from school to school, depending upon the agencies which they had  contracted, number of students and so on and, therefore, it could not  be uniform for all schools.
             Chief Educational Officer C. Amudhavalli said she would make a  comparative study about smart classes in about 10 schools in the  district and ascertain from IT professionals or agencies as to how much  expenditure a school would incur. Accordingly, she would arrive at the fees for smart classes and intimate it to the school by July 15. She pointed out that unusually a large number of students, 100, had  been sent out from the school by issuing transfer certificates. When considering the total strength of the school to be 2,500 the number of TCs issued was on the higher side, she said.
          Mr. Lakshmikandan contended that TCs were issued on the request of  parents because some of them wanted their wards to be migrated to other  schools owing to transfer, some students might find the matriculation  syllabus difficult to follow, and some might even go to a school which  they consider as highly reputed. Mr Lakshmikandan also said that as per the Right to Education Act,  students should not be detained up to Class VIII but there was no  provision that no disciplinary action should be taken for  insubordination and causing disturbance in the class.
           The teachers' representative put forth the view that at a time when  the teachers were demanding pay scale on a par with the government  schools any attempt to reduce the size of the fees would cut into their  salary. Inspector of Matriculation Schools R.Arunmozhithevi, tashildar  J.Rajendran, Deputy Superintendent of Police T.K.Natarajan, and C.Raju  of Manitha Urimai Padhukappu Iyakkam participated.
0 கருத்துகள்:
கருத்துரையிடுக